Thursday, February 13, 2025

A Tale of Two "Greek" Yogurts - Chobani vs Walmart (Great Value)

I like yogurt. I like flavored yogurts. I make dips and sauces out of yogurt. So when I saw a new yogurt appear on the supermarket shelf, I thought, hmmm, sounds good. No sugar. 12 grams of protein. Strawberries. What's not to like? It turns out there's a great deal NOT to like. If you want to cheat and go directly to the "taste-off" section, click here. But I urge you to read all the background stuff since the info may surprise you.

Chobani Zero Sugar

The ingredients:

First, the "all natural" ingredients in Chobani Zero Sugar:

Ultra-filtered nonfat milk**, water, skim milk†, allulose†, contains 2% or less of: natural flavors, tapioca flour, citrus fiber, sea salt, guar gum, stevia leaf extract (reb m), vegetable juice concentrate (for color)†, monk fruit extract, cultures. **Ingredient not found in regular yogurt. †Includes a dietarily insignificant amount of sugar.

The sweeteners:

We'll start with allulose also known as D-psicose. It's classified as a "rare" sugar found in figs, molasses and wheat. Rare because it's not commonly found in the usual sugary places like most fruits, root vegetables, sugar cane and saps. It is about 70% as sweet as real sugar but your body doesn't metabolize it so it can be helpful for those with insulin issues or simply not wanting additional sugar. There may also be some health benefits in reducing fatty liver, inflammation and obesity. However, the studies are small and very preliminary. Allulose is NOT approved for use as a food additive in Europe (EU). So eaters beware. For more on allulose, see this article on Healthline.

Next up is stevia leaf extract. The Reb M designation (rebaudioside M) is interesting because it's a relatively new variant of stevia concentrate that supposedly has less of an aftertaste than the more common Reb A variant. There are health concerns about stevia concentrates because they can interfere with gut health and digestion. Reb M is about 200x as sweet as sugar ounce per ounce.

Finally we have monk fruit extract. This stuff is good. No complaints or warnings from me. It's about 200x as sweet as sugar but it's usually combined with sugar alcohols (inulin or erythritol) when sold as a sugar substitute. The extract by itself is a powerful sweetener from a completely chemical structure than most sugar substitutes.

So here's my question. Why does Chobani need 3 completely different sweeteners (not to mention the strawberries) in its yogurt? I have a hard time believing that, at the minute concentrations of these sugar substitutes, they can really dial in the perfect sweetness. More on this later.

Other ingredients:

Nothing unusual about the other ingredients except for the "ultra-filtered" nonfat milk, tapioca flour, citrus fiber, natural flavors and guar gum. Do you detect some sarcasm here? Yep. It's because these aren't typically found in yogurts. Guar gum is an exception since many manufacturers use it as a thickener. Natural flavors is a catchall for lots of things that may or may not be natural. Finally the "ultra-filtered" nonfat milk is another way of saying "we removed the lactose and fat and things that make milk, milk" which may be ok if you are lactose intolerant.

So what's missing? Even though they're all over the package, there are NO actual strawberries in the Chobani yogurt. In fine print you'll see it's "Strawberry Flavored".

Nutrition label:

Protein good, net carbs are actually lower due to allulose.

Wally World "Great Value Light Greek Yogurt"

The ingredients:

Cultured pasteurized skim milk, strawberries, modified food starch, natural flavors, malic acid, acesulfame potassium, sucralose, and fruit and vegetable juice concentrate (color).

The sweeteners:

First up is acesulfame potassium. It's a synthetic sweetener that's about 200x sweeter than sugar and has a slightly bitter aftertaste. The bitter aftertaste is why it's seldom found alone in products but is combined with other sweeteners. It has been studied extensively and is generally considered safe by the FDA and by the EU. Next up is sucralose aka Splenda®. It's about 600x as sweet as sugar but because its chemical makeup is close to that of sucrose, it tastes pretty much just like sugar. Sucralose is often used as a standalone sweetener in many product. It was originally patented in 1976 however the only remaining patents cover manufacturing processes. This still makes it more expensive to use by itself so it's often combined with other sweeteners such as acesulfame potassium. Sucralose is generally considered safe by the FDA, EU and most other major national regulatory agencies.

The other ingredients

Modified food starch is used as a thickener. Yes, it's pretty much the same as the "corn starch" in your pantry although the source could be from other grains. Not scary and present in a lot of food products. Malic acid is a natural acid found in many fruits and berries such as apples, pears, blueberries and grapes. It's commonly used to add tartness to a wide range of products but if you really want to taste it on steroids, buy any bag of "salt & vinegar" chips. It's what gives the chips the "vinegar" taste.

Nutrition label:

Sugar is not zero (6 grams) and probably comes from the lactose in the milk and natural sweetness of the strawberries. Protein is slightly higher than Chobani and there are 20 more calories.

It comes down to taste

You could tell where this is going, right? Surprise surprise. The inexpensive Great Value yogurt is much better tasting with a much smoother texture than the Chobani. For all of its "natural" ingredients, the Chobani tastes artificial with a sickly sweet flavor. The texture is also very "chalky" or grainy. The Great Value yogurt, on the other hand, tastes like real strawberries and isn't nearly as over-sweetened. And, while not as creamy as most full fat yogurts, it's very smooth. When you compare prices, the GV is about $0.64 per serving while the Chobani is 3x as much at $1.80 per serving.
 

Monday, June 17, 2024

Biden Strategic Petroleum Reserve Draw Down

The claim has been running wild on X (Twitter) and via the apologist media that Biden has proven to be a brilliant oil trader because he sold oil at Price X and is now buying it back at Price Y. The amount of oil his administration has repurchased is miniscule. Here's a chart straight from the source. Biden started the draw down in early 2021 and continued to try to reduce gas prices for the 2022 election. There was nothing strategic about this since there was no national emergency requiring petroleum such as a natural disaster (hurricane, flood, tornado, etc.). COVID actually suppressed fuel use. 



Tuesday, January 16, 2024

I'll never buy another cell from Amazon again

I'll start off by stating that I have been an Amazon Prime customer since forever. I have an Amazon Chase credit card. I have never once abused the return process. Yet, the shabby treatment I was given by Amazon after when I tried to return a Samsung cell phone (because it was awful) says I'll never buy another cell phone from Amazon again.

Replacing the old LG v40

I've owned a bunch of cell phones in my life as a marketing exec and all-round techno geek. From early bricks to candy bars to the venerable Motorola StarTac, you name it, I've had it. I was even a member of the Samsung ecosystem for three years with a Galaxy Tab and a Galaxy phone.

So the time came for me to replace my old flagship LG V40 ThinQ (gee thanks LG for orphaning all your cell phones by closing the biz down). Anyway, I'm pretty committed to Android so I did my due diligence and researched the hell out of available models. Given my mediocre eyesight, I needed something with a decent sized screen.

I considered everything in the non-uber flagship category including the Pixel 7, Pixel 7 Pro, Pixel 8, Samsung Galaxy 23 & 22 (all models), OnePlus 11, etc., etc. The one phone that seemed to stand out for value and features was the Samsung Galaxy 23 FE (Fan Edition). Big screen, decent processor, good reviews. So I see a deal on Amazon for the phone including a $100 gift card that was lower than buying from Samsung direct. (Yes, Amazon was both seller and shipper.) Order the phone and 2 days later, it shows up on my doorstep. (A bit disturbing that Amazon doesn't require signature proof of delivery but will just leave a $600 package lying on your porch.)

Samsung Galaxy 23FE Sux

Literally after 4 days of using the phone, my hand hurt from holding it. The sharp aluminum frame made it an ergonomic disaster. To top it off, I remembered why I gave up on Samsung years ago -- you end up with bloatware and non-Google versions of apps that don't really do much more than the apps they replace. Calendar, Messaging, Contacts, etc. all end up in the Samsung ecosystem which doesn't always play nice with Google's online stuff, To top things off, the cameras were underwhelming at best. My LG v40 did a better job and with less twiddly fiddly stuff. All said and done, it was just a very awkward phone and definitely not something I could live with. (And no, I couldn't find an in-store version to try out.)

The nightmare begins

OK, so I decide to return the phone and get my coin back. Call Amazon just to make sure I'm doing the return correctly since I've never sent anything valued at 6 bills back. Very perky and nice person from some far-off country says no problem, we'll take care of this right away and she issues my return. Feeling reasonably good, I reset the phone to factory and pack it up documenting the boxing. Interestingly enough, Amazon does NOT accept cell phone returns at their big huge Hub Center located about 2 miles from my house. Nope, it has to go to UPS. OK that seems weird but whatever. 

So I drop the phone off at UPS on 11/9/23 and get the usual scanned receipt and tracking code. A few days later, I start checking the return status thinking I should see something. Nada. No record of dropping off, nothing. Finally on 11/15 I call Amazon up to see what the return status was. Another CSR from a far-off land tells me in broken English that they show the record of the phone having been dropped off. Whew. But it still doesn't show that on my client side return status.

Another week goes by and nothing has changed on the return. Still no credit. I call Amazon again. CSR (from far-off land) says oh we still haven't received it at our return processing center. WHAT?? Your return center is in Las Vegas, I'm in California! That's a 2-day truck ride tops! "Sorry sir. I will put in a manual request for update." Now I'm getting nervous since I'm going on a 3-week vacation out of the USA and don't want this hanging over my head.

The day before I leave for vacation on 12/2, I call Amazoo again to check the status. Now the far-off CSR says yes they received it (supposedly on 11/18 but my tracking shows they actually got it on 11/15) but it will take 30-days to process. Uh, no, that's not what your other CSRs AND your automated emails say. They say within 5 - 7 days of receipt followed by another 5 - 7 days for financial institution to process credit. CSR then sends me a totally different email from the automated ones that now says 30 DAYS from receipt. WTF? Even after sending Amazon screen shots of their OWN texts updating the return and chat conversations saying 5 - 7 days, this last CSR sticks to his guns on 30 days from their recorded receipt.

The final straw

Now I'm gone for three weeks and can't do anything until I get back to the US which I do on 12/16. Once again, I call Amazon from Galveston with the "where's my refund" bit. "I'm sorry sir but it hasn't been 30 days." Uh yes it has. My tracking shows you got it on 11/15, here's the UPS tracking #, check it yourself. "Yes sir but it was not received into our system until 11/18." Clenching my jaw and growling, I wait the extra 3 days and call Amazon back on 12/18". This time, the far-off CSR finally admits, oh yes, I see we are actually at 33 days. I will put in a manual request for the refund." And she does. And the refund finally shows up on my VISA dated 12/18.

Final observations

To me, this was just an easy way for Amazon to hold onto $600 for 45 days (clock starting on 11/9 when I dropped it off at UPS). In the days of low interest rates, 45 days at 1% isn't much. Now, 45 days at 6% float is an extra $3, which, over literally hundreds of millions of transactions that Amazon processes, can actually add up. The other major irritation in all this were the emails and texts giving me false hope on refund processing time.

What do I think happened?

I'm guessing someone inside Amazon's return center is now enjoying their free Samsung Galaxy 23FE and Amazon strung me out hoping I'd go away.





Tuesday, January 10, 2023

Some COVID, hospitalization and vaccine stats from Australia

Zero hospitalizations, zero ICU admissions from unvaccinated (Australia)

Here's the first chart. Note the data for deaths, ICU admissions and hospitalizations has an inverse relationship to vaccine doses. The more doses you've had after the initial one or two, the more likely you are to get hospitalized or admitted to ICU or die. What's alarming about this is that, as we'll see in the next chart, the inverse is true for number of doses administered per 100,000K. Note that Australia is almost completely vaccinated via the mRNA type vaccines.

Vaccine doses administered as percentage of population (Australia)

In the following chart, we see the percentage of total population by dose count. Since the normal dosing for the mRNA vaccines is two within 30 days, Australia shows 85% of its population having achieved "fully vaccinated status" 56% have been boosted once and 21% have been boosted twice.

The boosted are at the greatest risk

So now we can do some simple math from the first chart and what we have clearly shows an INVERSE relationship between vaccinations AND hospitalizations, ICU and deaths, especially for those boosted. If the vaccines were working as intended, we should see rates going down as the population becomes more vaccinated. Instead, we see rates greater than expected as vaccination counts go up. This is clearly the case for those having received four doses (2 original + 2 boosters).

Doses

% Pop

% Hospitalizations*

% ICU*

% Deaths*

4+

21%

57%

56%

60%

3

31%

27%

28%

22%

2

43%

15%

16%

10%

1

2%

1.4%

1%

1%

0

3%

0%

0%

7%

 

100%

100%

101%

100%

*For known vaccine status (source www.health.nsw.au.gov)

Those with 3 shots are roughly 2x likely to end up the hospital, IC or die from COVID vs those with only 2 shots. Likewise, those with 4+ shots are 4x more likely than those with 2 shots. This is likely somewhat self-selecting (older people and those with comorbidities are more likely to get boosted) but the profound difference in rates may have a lot to do with booster immunity waning quickly and leaving the body less able to fight off new strains or even diseases other than COVID. 

Natural immunity

Finally, we have a compound problem in countries with extremely high vaccination rates (like Australia). There are few people left who have pure natural immunity (contracted COVID but never vaccination). In fact, Australia has pushed vaccines even onto those who had contracted COVID. 

What we likely have, as in the United States, is a large population that received two mRNA shots (perhaps early in year one of the pandemic), have subsequently contracted COVID (probably Omicron) and are now reluctant to get boosted.

Given the results in Australia, that reluctance may be well founded even if not confirmed by direct research. Regardless, we do have data showing that natural immunity from having contracted COVID is AT LEAST as good and probably better than vaccination induced immunity. One study (Effects of Vaccination and Previous Infection on Omicron Infections in Children | NEJM) on children aged 5 - 11 appears to show that vaccinated children had greatly REDUCED immunity 12 weeks after the second shot (down to 20%) versus unvaxed children who had contracted COVID still going relatively strong after the same length of time (55% immunity).

The murky area is what happens to immunity from contracting COVID after having been "fully vaccinated" (two mRNA shots). There doesn't appear to be good data. 


Thursday, December 29, 2022

Stupid Amazon reviews, search and other gripes

I was searching for a 15' Display Port (or DisplayPort) to HDMI conversion cable on Amazoo recently and wow, talk about a minefield. Seems like a fixed 5% of the reviews, no matter whose product, will be 1-star. No 2-star reviews. A bunch of 3's and then, mostly 4 & 5. Some of them are entertaining to the point of comedy.

What gripes me is that so many people try to use a product for a non-intended purpose and then trash the product for not performing up to expectations. Such is the case with DP to HDMI cables. ALL the product descriptions clearly state these cables are ONE-WAY. They take a DP signal OUT from a source (laptop, game console, etc.) and convert it to HDMI which goes INTO a display device (monitor, TV). Yet, you still have people who try to plug the cable into the DP on the TV or monitor and plug the HDMI end into their laptop (usually a Mac...are Apple users that bad at reading?). Bang, instant bad review "defective cable, doesn't work."

Amazon search needs improving

We can all be stupid at times, right? In my case, it's not paying 100% attention to search results that include "sponsored" results. 95% of the time, the "sponsored" results are NOT what I'm looking for. In the case of DP to HDMI, almost ALL the sponsored results were for HDMI to HDMI cables. Yeah great specs but not what I needed.

Anyway, I put a 15 foot Amazon Basics DP to HDMI cable into my cart and then Amazoo started prompting me to get free overnight delivery by adding another $13 to my order.

Thinking I was getting a different DP to HDMI cable, I blithely put a "sponsored" cable from "PowerBear" into the cart. Got the PB cable with the Amazon cable and noted immediately that it was HDMI to HDMI. Did they ship me the wrong one? Nope. The "sponsored" listing was so filled with buzz words and verbiage that it obfuscated the straight HDMI. Sigh. That will teach me to order shit after two adult beverages.

The good news is the Amazon Basics cable seems to work for my application which is to extend the screen of an old HP laptop onto my Toshiba 1080p TV for karaoke lyrics. But again, 5% of the reviews think this cable is junk, defective, fattening, immoral and causes herpes.

Somehow, Amazon needs to figure out how to leave out "sponsored" results that don't apply to the search at hand. I'm guessing companies are paying for the keywords: HDMI, cable, adapter. Even though their products don't do Display Port, you get those anyway. (Note that using + as Display+Port helps reduce the noise but you still end up with wonkiness.)

Clothing search

My other gripe is clothing searches. I realize that Amazon can only load up what a seller says about their products but you'd THINK we could get better standardized sizing. ALL men's pants should have specifications for WAIST and INSEAM. Instead, it's a mashup of varying specs that make searching for a particular size almost impossible. You want something with a 32" waist and 29" inseam (aka SHORT), you simply can't do it. Put in the keyword "SHORT" and of course you get Men's Shorts. put in "29 inseam" and you get any listing with the number 29 and random things from "inseam".

Why can't Amazon take some cues from the big online clothing retailers (LL Bean, Land's End, etc.) and design a proper sizing / tagging system?

Monday, June 20, 2022

Twitter BLOCKING Blogspot / Blogger domain as MALWARE

 You can see here that I can't put the URL into a tweet OR update my profile. I get a blue popup (which I can't capture) that says Twitter has identified this URL as MALWARE. Hmmm a Google product blocked by a competitor.


Monday, May 23, 2022

HP (again, again, again) locks out 3rd-party ink - Officejet, Envy

HP Ink Cartridge Warning
HP Inkjet Cartridge Warning

Way back in 2016, HP pushed out a firmware update to its OfficeJet inkjet printers that locked people out of using third-party ink. Of course HP didn't notify anyone that the "update" was coming and instead pushed it out as a stealth firmware change via the HP Smart desktop app.

As you can imagine, the backlash against HP was universal with owners crying foul. Many of them had stocked up on third-party ink and suddenly those cartridges no longer worked. HP Is Once Again Breaking Printers With Third-Party Ink Cartridges [Updated] - ExtremeTech. People who had invested hundreds of dollars in previously work ink cartridges suddenly found themselves with useless inventory. Of course HP's cartridges for most OfficeJets will set you back $80/set.

HP sort of apologized and gave techies a way to bypass the restriction through a special printer driver. Regardless, there was enough screaming that HP eventually undid the lockout via another firmware push. However, HP reserved the right to do it again. 


Move to 2019 and HP indeed tried this again with a stealth update. Same thing happened with user and media backlash. HP backed down once again.

Now here in May 2022, HP has done it again with a stealth update. Boom, all my Office World cartridges that had been working fine for two years are suddenly bricked. And I can't print period unless I pay $80 for HP genuine ink. To top this off, I've also read reports in the HP Community Forum that people with genuine cartridges that HP considers "out of date" can't use those either. 

HP Support

I contacted HP Support on three occasions (which seems based in India given all the Hindi first names I encountered) to see what the answers would be. Each encounter was always "Oh we are sorry this happened to you. We do not like to disappoint our customers. Let me see what I can do." This was invariably followed by some checking and then a response of HP trying to ensure "print quality" in its products and there was nothing they could do.

HP Print Quality

Here's the thing about print quality. IT'S MY DAMN PRINTER AND I'LL BE THE JUDGE OF PRINT QUALITY. If I'm willing to accept the risk of poor print quality and/or damaging the printer, that's my decision and not HP's. I get it that printers under warranty wouldn't be covered if you use third party ink. But I'm willing to take that risk since the cartridges are 1/3 the price of HP's.

What about refills?

Supposedly HP allows their cartridges to be refilled; but there's a catch. According to users in the HP forums, genuine cartridges have a stealth page counter that will lock THAT cartridge out if refilled. Some report being able to get one full refill's worth; other's report only getting 1/2 or 2/3 worth.

Class action lawsuit?

Count me in. If you're an attorney who thinks this intentional bricking of previously working ink cartridges is actionable, let me know in the comments.

Wednesday, February 23, 2022

The (racist) American Community Survey

Greetings from the Census Bureau 

My 93-year old mother got the American Community Survey (ACS) from the US Census Bureau the other day and being legally blind, asked me to fill it out. They had already sent her three letters telling her to fill it out online which is tough since she doesn't have a computer or even know how to use one. Being persistent, they sent her the long form paper version.

What is the ACS? It's a long-form survey sent out in non-census years to a sampling of the US population. Yes, by law, if you get one you are required to fill it out.

I'm struck by a few things. First, it's "American" Community Survey. Are they also surveying Canada (the American dictatorship to the north) along with Central America and South America? OK that's a quibble. 

Second, the form is a 48-pages and is literally a blinding array of questions ranging from race and ethnicity to income, housing, insurance, military status, etc. but not legal immigration status.

What really caught me up were the questions about race and ethnicity which we'll discuss later.

Non-binary cosmic muffins

So let's start with literally the first box you fill out. No personal pronouns or non-binary sexes allowed here. You are "Male" or "Female". Now that's got to make the woke generation go insane. What??? I can't self-identify as a non-binary trans female who dates furries? Nope. Also, the question "How is this person related to Person 1?" seems kind of weird given that Person 1 is already checked.

What kind of person are you (politically correct version)?

Now we start on the fun stuff. Race and ethnicity. You almost have to construct a Venn diagram to make sense out of this portion of the ACM. It actually comes in two parts. People of Hispanic, Latino or Spanish origin (since the Census can't just call them "hispanic") get their own box. And they get their own "where are you from" section as well. 

Mexican is lumped with Mexican American and Chicano while Puerto Rican and Cuban folks get their own boxes. But how come no Cuban American? And technically Peurto Ricans (like most of us) are already American. It's so confusing!

Now if, god forbid, you should be yet another type of Hispanic, Latino or Spanish person, you're asked to further pigeonhole yourself. My favorite example though is "Spaniard". Yes it's technically correct but it's also worked its way into the lingua franca (or lengua espana) as a somewhat derogatory term for upper class non-Mexican Spanish. But this also begs the question, should Portuguese and Brazilians be messing with this box at all? Does your head hurt yet?

At least there's no category of Latinx.

More checkboxes and fill in the blanks!

This stuff must be really important to the powers that be except if you are white or black. Then, not so much. Unlike those Hispanic, Latino or Mexican Americans, white or black people only get one damn checkbox! That's clear racial inequality. Write your elected officials today and demand more checkboxes.

Now the weird part about this is if you check any of the top three boxes, you MUST fill out text below in the online version of this form. It's a "required" field. Apparently White American is not acceptable (even though our family emigrated from England before the Revolutionary War). 

I'd hate to consider what you might do if you're White and have German, Irish, Dutch and French in your family tree. Can you put "Mutt" in the text box? How about Euro-American? 

While we're still on the White box, look at the Lebanese, Egyptian part of it. Are they "white", Arabic, Indo-Arab, Afro-Arab or to use a term out of favor, Semitic?

If you actually look at the ethnic and genetic makeup of Egyptians in general, you'll find they're about 85% Arab-African but, uniquely, Egyptian. Alas, the Census Bureau considers them "White".

Does the guy on the right look "White"? (Hint: he's the President of Egypt.)

Black or African Am.?

Now I'm not sure why the Census Bureau uses the shorthand for "American" as "Am." in some places but not in others. Here, as in other places, there's plenty of room to write out "American". It's almost like some copy editor said "hey, tone down that American crap; it sounds too MAGA."

And here we are again, Blacks don't get their own separate checkboxes like the Hispanics. It's an injustice I tell you. But at least the Census suggests that African American is OK even though the checkbox already includes that. So technically, you can be African American - African American like maybe you're extra African and extra American. Would you be African American² or African American x 2? 

All you other people

And finally we get to "Asian Indian" (as opposed to Indian Indian -- see above) and Other Asian. More silliness here because now we are dealing even less with racial makeup and more with ethnicity or nationality. Again, this whole section is about race. I actually had to look up the Chamorro "race". It's not a race. It's an identity by ethnicity and origin (mostly Guamanians and Micronesians). 

Where is all this leading?

By the time I finished just this first page of the ACS, I felt like I had stepped into a dystopian world where people are judged  not just by the color of their skin but by a thoroughly opaque layer of micro-ethnicities that only an Aryian Fuhrer could love. Again, why the special attention to Hispanics? Is it for target programs? Planned pandering? I have spent most of my working career in executive level marketing positions. I've analyzed data, constructed surveys and polls, put together focus groups and developed products and strategies to fit those answers. The ACS seems like more of a mashup than something cohesive and of deep value to the country.

I may go into some of the other areas of the ACS in a future article. The insurance section alone will drive the average person batty. But I'll have to take a hefty dose of pink liquid if I do.

Monday, February 7, 2022

Freebie Canadian Trucker Support Bumper Stickers


I put this together for anyone wanting to print their own bumper stickers in support of the Canadian trucker protests. These will print 4-up with cut marks on standard 8 1/2" x 11" bumper sticker / vinyl paper. (Sorry metric fans, there is very little A4 sticker material available.) If you really want an A4 version, let me know via g*e*l*d*n*e*r <at> gmail.com. I've also linked to a PDF version below so you can resize it in Illustrator.


Truck Trudeau





Link to PDF version

Wednesday, January 5, 2022

Media blames society for shaming people who've had COVID

I haven't written anything long form for a while but this has driven me to gripe again. Today I noticed a tweet thread from Chris Cillizza, CNN Politics Reporter and Editor-At-Large. (He's the guy who tries to not sound as batshit crazy as Brian Stelter.) Cillizza was bemoaning the fact that those in his bubble wouldn't admit they had COVID. 

Cillizza goes on to observe that "societally we unknowingly turned having Covid into some sort of judgment on your character". (emphasis mine)
The pure self-unawareness here is the completely ignoring the role the media (Chris' team), government and big tech have played in pushing this sort of thinking onto society. This is not a collective we. This was not unknowingly. It was a collective, coordinated and completely conscious effort by media/tech/gov to shame people into getting the unproven and untested vaccines, wearing masks, isolating and social distancing. 

So if you got COVID, naturally you must be doing something wrong. Maybe you went to a football game (even though they have not turned out to be the super spreaders Fauci predicted). Maybe you didn't wear your mask 100% of the time. Went to a birthday party. Let your kids play with those unwashed heathen kids down the street. Shopped at a crowded store. Didn't stay on the 6' dot. Got the wrong vax at the wrong time. Or maybe you had heretical thoughts like why are my kids going to get vaxed when they rarely get really sick from COVID?

Since Cillizza no doubt associates only with like-minded left-leaning political types, it's easy to see how the shame factor can kick in. All you have to do is watch a few hysterical, over the top videos on TikTok to realize how deranged some people's thought processes have become. And not just about COVID but about nearly everything. Rational thinking has been supplanted by "feelings".

Cellizza closes his tweet storm with Omicron changing the dynamic. Sadly it's true. When the supposed smart people start realizing that the virus is gonna virus no matter what, it may change some minds. HOWEVER, it's still not enough to force the necessary introspection needed to admit THEY were wrong all along about pretty much everything from the response to the positioning.

We still don't have testing for antibodies to tell the unvaxed if they should get vaxed. (Yes, I firmly believe that natural immunity is far more durable and long lasting from having had COVID than any mRNA vax can deliver.) We still have a coercive approach to vaccinations. We still have teachers using COVID as a weapon so they don't have to work. We still have pressure on kids to get vaxed when they are at almost zero risk from COVID. We still have people being required to wear a mask when they walk to their table in restaurant only to take them off when they are seated. (Because of course, COVID doesn't transmit at seated level, only when standing.) We still fire healthcare workers because they refuse to take an experimental vaccine (and may have natural immunity),

So Chris' little "ah-ha" moment is really a drop in the bucket that will ultimately change nothing about the politics of COVID. As long as the left continues to see COVID as an opportunity weapon of control, nothing will change.

Thursday, February 11, 2021

Tom's Awesome Spicy Dill Dip for Tortilla Chips


So here's a change for you --  recipe without ads, without pages of useless text about how wonderful the author is or that force you to scroll to see more ads. 

Tom's Spicy Dill Dip

A sour cream dip that works great with tortilla chips. Every time I serve this at parties, it's always one of the first dips to disappear. The two key ingredients are lots of black pepper and lots of dried dill weed.

Ingredients

  • 8 oz sour cream
  • 3 tbsp dill weed (minimum)
  • 3 tsp fine ground black pepper (ie. table pepper)
  • Dash ground cayenne pepper
  • Dash garlic powder
  • Dash to 1/8 tsp salt
Mix everything thoroughly and refrigerate for at least 20 minutes! 

Don't be tempted to taste it right away (to adjust ingredients). It takes awhile for the black pepper and dill to come up to full flavor. Also, don't be tempted to add more salt. Trust me, if you use this with tortilla chips, more salt will actually impair the flavor combo. However, feel free to adjust the other ingredients per your taste buds. I actually up the black pepper at times and really more dill is like "MORE COWBELL". You know you want it!

Saturday, January 19, 2019

Some Amazon customers are idiots

The Original Idiot
Amazon (and its vendors) have largely farmed tech support and pre-sales support to customers. Whether it's a product review that goes into detail about how something works or an answer to a public question about a product, you rarely see seller interaction. Fine and dandy. But there's a dark side.

Today we're going to pay a visit to the cesspool known as Amazon's Customer Questions & Answers that appears for all products. Want to know what size a product is measured in a peculiar way? Need to find out if it includes a cover? Or whether it fits your particular device not listed specifically? How about the length of the fingers in a pair of gloves? Instead of having online sales or tech people that actually know shit, Amazon sends you blindfolded into the River Styx on your way to product answer hell.

The Unhelpful Answer

First complaint are customers who answer questions in idiotic ways. These have actually come up in my recent searches for aftermarket replacement batteries for a Canon digicam. Check this out:

Uh no dude, Canon won't answer a question about an aftermarket (Wasabi) battery. And then, one month later, the SAME guy gives another helpful answer to a legit question.
What? You actually came BACK to annoy another customer with a dumbass answer a second time?? How about this one...
Sort of sounds like Dr. McCoy from StarTrek doesn't he? JIM, I'M A CUSTOMER, NOT A TECHNICIAN!

The Really Unhelpful Answer

These answers take unhelpful to the next level. 
At least she's used this product (bug spray) but she personally hasn't used it in Asia! Oh my. Here's  one from a guy who makes sure he let's the questioner know he doesn't know the answer but it's OK to ask. Does this guy lurk the Q&A sections to pass judgment on other's questions?
I also see the extreme of unhelpful where random Amazon Customers answer\ with "I don't know. I haven't used it." or the ultimate "I don't know. I haven't bought it yet.". Think I'm kidding? Here's a double dumb:
Not only has this guy not used the product, he apparently hasn't even opened the package to see if it came with extra cleats! Truly a 9 out of 10 on the unhelpful scale.

It's almost as if people are lurking in the Q&A sections just to answer questions they have no clue about. The "I don't know. I haven't used it." response is actually common. And of course once someone has answered a question moronically, it looks like the question has been answered. So from that point forward, it gets no more responses.

The Funny Answer

Everyone's read phony and often funny reviews before. Amazon is filled with them (not counting the shill reviews). Occasionally though, someone asks a tongue-in-cheek question and you're rewarded with some creative replies. Like this:
For some reason, the Ninja blenders seem to attract nonsense questions and replies. Of course I'd want to know if you can blend whole fresh fish like the Bass-O-Matic.

How about you?

So what do you think about Amazon's Q&A? Similar problems?

Saturday, December 29, 2018

Amazon now charging to return Prime items

I have been a Prime member since forever and almost always buy items marked Prime eligible because returns have been no hassle and no charge. Until today.

For the first time EVER, I went to return two out of three items (a small messenger bag and a tote). The reason for the return? "Style not as expected" In one case, the bag was unsuited for a laptop because it wasn't padded on the bottom. In the other, it was just super awkward to use.

So I was pretty much blown away when I got to the finalize return page and it showed an $8.03 return shipping charge. WTH? I didn't click through and immediately contacted Amazon Customer Service via online chat.

While in the end, the CS rep put through a manual return without the return shipping charge, my experience was a huge step down from previous contacts with Amazon. First, the rep said it was a re-stocking fee, not a shipping charge. What?? Nope it said SHIPPING on the page. Second, the rep never answered my question about how one would know about the charge in advance. He (Steven S.) simply pasted a link to Amazon's general return policies. And finally when I AGAIN tried to get a further explanation about how to figure things out in the future, he simply LEFT CHAT leaving me hanging.

After this episode, just to double-check, I went to Amazon's help pages and looked for info on returns and couldn't find anything specific that dealt with Prime and shipping charges on returns.

After posting my story on Facebook tonight, I immediately got 3 replies from friends who have recently had the same thing happen to them AND had never had it happen before. One friend commented that Amazon customer service has gone downhill in general. She noted when items are delayed in shipping (the famous "Order now and get it by xx/xx/xx"), Amazon no longer compensates in some way. They simply say "check with us in a few days".

 Relaying my experience on Twitter got this response from Amazon:
This sucks and nowhere has Amazon informed its customers up front that they're now doing this. So I predict a few things will happen:
  • Customers will do far less shopping on "spec" items or where they're not sure about the quality, fit, color or finish.
  • Any returns that aren't "free returns" will be "defective" in some respect.
  • Prime members may reconsider paying $120/year for "free" shipping.
  • More shopping will be done at retailers like Staples, Wal-Mart or Best Buy where you can return items no charge at a physical store.
This just seems stupidly short sighted by Amazon.  As always, comments welcome.